Here. In the Republican party. In a conservative bent. On the other side of the coin.
And I think Michael Moore is a shameless self-promoter, who has used the genuine belief of others such as yourself for his own ends. I have no problem with him presenting such a work as an interpretation or a viewpoint; I have a vast problem with him presenting it as a documentary. I would have similar problems regardless of the subject matter.
Of course it's an interpetation and skewed to his viewpoint--but that doesn't make it not a documentary. All documentaries do that. If it's fiction, I think the person is asking, what facts was he making up in it?
![[identity profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/openid.png){kind=small}
![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
branchandroot
(no subject)
Date: 2004-12-09 08:00 pm (UTC)And I think Michael Moore is a shameless self-promoter, who has used the genuine belief of others such as yourself for his own ends. I have no problem with him presenting such a work as an interpretation or a viewpoint; I have a vast problem with him presenting it as a documentary. I would have similar problems regardless of the subject matter.
~A
(no subject)
Date: 2004-12-10 06:10 pm (UTC)