And it was a pretty big challenge to choose the most horrific part - but frankly, while there are problems in having teachers who've had no certification process and no training in teaching, especially on an elementary school classroom-teacher level* and there are catastrophic issues with McCain's health care proposals and his complaints about John Lewis just feel weird, none of that demonstrably minimizes the health of girls and women across the country. What's next? Air quotes for "incest" or "rape"?
[Poll #1279744]
* I think there is merit in having middle- and high-school teachers, and in specialty classes, where someone who doesn't have a specific certification but does have a specialty in that area, but given that I've just been through a situation where someone with a teaching degree but no early childhood education was my son's kindergarten teacher (until the principal removed her because she wasn't a good K-level teacher) and was rapidly screwing up his learning experience, I'm not very into it for the K-5 level.
(no subject)
Date: 2008-10-16 02:41 pm (UTC)good point
Date: 2008-10-16 05:38 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2008-10-16 02:42 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2008-10-16 02:58 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2008-10-16 03:30 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2008-10-16 02:57 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2008-10-16 08:05 pm (UTC)(no subject)
From:(no subject)
Date: 2008-10-16 02:59 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2008-10-16 03:14 pm (UTC)I like what DeviousRogue said about this:
• [Obama's] attempts to find common political ground on the subject of how teens can avoid unintended pregnancies were noble.
• I fear McCain, in discussing this same topic, ironically authorized a late-term abortion of his campaign.
(no subject)
Date: 2008-10-16 03:17 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2008-10-16 03:54 pm (UTC)That video made me absolutely incensed. I vented in my LJ.
I am so angry.
(no subject)
Date: 2008-10-16 05:01 pm (UTC)Meh.
Having said that, Obama had a much better response...ahem =)
(no subject)
Date: 2008-10-16 05:18 pm (UTC)That being said and most bias against Obama aside, the way I took the air quotes is to mean that the majority of women do not have abortions because of their health - they do it as a form of birth control, yet it's still referred to as "women's health". It isn't women's health anymore, it's the health of the baby and the total rejection of the child's right to life without any valid and reasonable justification for it other than "I didn't feel like having/can't afford to have a kid right now".
(no subject)
Date: 2008-10-16 06:07 pm (UTC)So, so do not agree with you on this. I'm a Brit, but I cannot believe McCain would be so very very stupid. And as much as I disapprove of a lot of reasons for abortion, it's just as awful to condemn a woman to a life she doesn't want just because she was more than slightly stupid. Sorry,
(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:Men won't date a woman who wont have sex with them
From:(no subject)
Date: 2008-10-16 08:19 pm (UTC)No, it isn't referred to as "women's health", at least it isn't in the courts. The language about abortion being legal throughout a pregnancy if abortion is necessary to protect the woman's life or health comes directly from Planned Parenthood v Casey, which included
Planned Parenthood of Southeastern Pa. v. Casey, 505 U.S. 833 (1992), quoting Roe v Wade
(no subject)
From:(no subject)
Date: 2008-10-16 06:11 pm (UTC)http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5IS0PJdE0Cs
YES.
(no subject)
Date: 2008-10-16 08:20 pm (UTC)I am ashamed....
Date: 2008-10-16 06:37 pm (UTC)Re: I am ashamed....
Date: 2008-10-18 08:19 am (UTC)Type "debates" in the search box, and it should be the first thing that comes up.
Finding the debates
Date: 2008-10-18 08:22 am (UTC)http://www.cnn.com/ELECTION/2008/debates/ge/index.html
Re: Finding the debates
From:(no subject)
Date: 2008-10-16 07:06 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2008-10-16 10:40 pm (UTC)(Transcript from CBS.com):
MCCAIN: Let me just say categorically I'm proud of the people that come to our rallies. Whenever you get a large rally of 10,000, 15,000, 20,000 people, you're going to have some fringe peoples. You know that. And I've -- and we've always said that that's not appropriate.
But to somehow say that group of young women who said "Military wives for McCain" are somehow saying anything derogatory about you, but anything -- and those veterans that wear those hats that say "World War II, Vietnam, Korea, Iraq," I'm not going to stand for people saying that the people that come to my rallies are anything but the most dedicated, patriotic men and women that are in this nation and they're great citizens.
And I'm not going to stand for somebody saying that because someone yelled something at a rally -- there's a lot of things that have been yelled at your rallies, Senator Obama, that I'm not happy about either.
In fact, some T-shirts that are very...
OBAMA: John, I...
MCCAIN: ... unacceptable. So the point is -- the point is that I have repudiated every time someone's been out of line, whether they've been part of my campaign or not, and I will continue to do that.
But the fact is that we need to absolutely not stand for the kind of things that have been going on. I haven't.
(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
Date: 2008-10-17 12:27 am (UTC)http://www.dailykos.com/storyonly/2008/10/16/2041/5939/586/633015
(no subject)
Date: 2008-10-17 01:50 am (UTC)Seriously. I have never wanted to deck a politician so much in my entire life. Not even the asshat in Virginia who wanted to make every late period a reportable offense.
(no subject)
Date: 2008-10-17 01:54 am (UTC)(I bet, however, that he did not just do it for the lulz.)
(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
Date: 2008-10-17 05:44 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2008-10-17 08:27 am (UTC)The biggest problem that I had with McCain's statement of having returning military personnel enter a classroom without needing to get certified is the way he said it. It sounded to me like he was dismissing the notions of needing teaching certificates at all, and that they are perfectly trained to enter into a classroom and just start teaching.
Also, it is actually common practice for secondary educators to enter the field from another career. My math teacher in high school (I had him for 4 years, from Geometry thru AP Calculus) used to work for NASA before becoming a teacher. Also being a teacher, I knew several who had switched fields. If you are qualified for the academic merits, then you can be hired while you go through the certification process. Many of the teachers that I have mentioned would have about 3 years to pass the certification tests, and they would attend professional development workshops offered by the county. A simple process really.
I suppose my point is this: what makes a serviceman/woman more qualified to teach in a classroom that they don't need to be certified than the retired engineer wanting to teach math?
And this is not meant to disrespect the military in anyway. Just a case of why is A more capable than B.
(no subject)
Date: 2008-10-17 02:36 pm (UTC)Nothing. Which is why what McCain said is incorrect.
He was referring to a program that already exists, it's called Troops to Teachers (http://www.ed.gov/programs/troops/index.html). From the website:
McCain completely mischaracterized it. Any veterans that want to transition to becoming a teacher must clearly have the necessary qualifications.
(no subject)
From: