JKR Answers mark Evans Question

[heidi]

He's nobody, and she didn't even realise what she'd done until people started theorizing. Evans, she says on her site, is a common name, and she just picked it because he was a nobody-character, like Madam Marsh, who needed to be named.

But at least she said that many of the theories people promulgated were highly plausible. I guess she just wasn't willing to rewrite her plot to incorporate any? ;)

Want to read her answer yourself? Follow these instructions:

Click the F.A.Q (the paper clips), then click "about the books" (envelope at the right), then at a note half hidden to the left of the FAQ list, then on "F.A.Q. poll".

Comments

*pokes* Play nice, buster

[harlequincy.livejournal.com]

"A) Evans is a common name."

I think the point is that... so are many other names. She couldn't have chosen a different common name? Like say, Smith? Burns? Johnson? Hill? Graham? Miller? Sawyer? The list goes freakin' on? It's just very odd that she chose Evans for this "random boy" when Evans is the name of a very significant character.

"B) For god's sake GET A LIFE.

Can you be nicer please? No one is trying to piss you off, I promise. It would be nice if you did everyone else the same courtesy.

Re: *pokes* Play nice, buster

[heidi8.livejournal.com]

Smith? Burns? Johnson? Hill? Graham? Miller? Sawyer?

But had she chosen Smith, everyone would've wondered if he was related to Zacharias.

Re: *pokes* Play nice, buster

[harlequincy.livejournal.com]

Well yes, exactly the point. I'm just wondering how she didn't notice her own characters' names... *shrug* I dunno, I don't think it really matters that much... all I'm sayin' is that it's pretty strange that she *did* choose Evans, and I can understand those who would be annoyed by her screw-up.

Re: *pokes* Play nice, buster

[slippery-fish.livejournal.com]

Well, that's the thing about common names, isn't it? Important people and nobodies run around with the same name. It happens in real life, why shouldn't it happen fiction?

But it's kind of weird she didn't notice. Maybe she mocks her fans a bit or maybe she doesn't care about Lily as much as the fans. Yes, Lily is important but probably only as Harry's mother and not as a person. *shrugs* Well, maybe she simply doesn't care about names...

Re: *pokes* Play nice, buster

[harlequincy.livejournal.com]

"Well, that's the thing about common names, isn't it? Important people and nobodies run around with the same name. It happens in real life, why shouldn't it happen fiction?"

That's actually a really good point. The only thing I'd say is that in a children's story where everything else works like clockwork, and everything is very planned out... it just seems out of place to be adding such a dimension of realism, you know?

"Yes, Lily is important but probably only as Harry's mother and not as a person."

I've also thought about that. I've begun to wonder whether Lily's importance has been played up in my mind due to things I've read around fandom. But then I think, "Well, she *is* the reason Harry is alive, and Voldemort *did* say she didn't have to die, right?" So now I'm just boggling over whether she really is important or not. Because if she really were as important as I previously thought her to be, then it seems JKR really really should've paid a lot of attention to her. But now I am just confused. *wibbles*

Re: *pokes* Play nice, buster

[slippery-fish.livejournal.com]

That's actually a really good point. The only thing I'd say is that in a children's story where everything else works like clockwork, and everything is very planned out... it just seems out of place to be adding such a dimension of realism, you know?

If she hadn't said she didn't notice I would say it could be a try to break out of this plan. That it maybe became too constructed for her. But judging from her comment...*shrugs* I really don't know. I guess I just don't mind that she made that mistake because the story gets a bit realer with it.

I've also thought about that. I've begun to wonder whether Lily's importance has been played up in my mind due to things I've read around fandom. But then I think, "Well, she *is* the reason Harry is alive, and Voldemort *did* say she didn't have to die, right?" So now I'm just boggling over whether she really is important or not. Because if she really were as important as I previously thought her to be, then it seems JKR really really should've paid a lot of attention to her. But now I am just confused. *wibbles*

Aren't we all? *g* If she is only important because she saved Harry then she is a very important character in the book, but not because of herself. In that case the name is probably not important. But if she did something before Harry that is important and that we simply don't know about yet it gets more complicated. Rowling should have remembered her in that case...Oh well,maybe we learn more about Lily in the next book...