heidi: (No Actual Spoilers)
[personal profile] heidi
It's not the first time they've written about the HP fandom, or HP slash, but it is the first time they've put "fanfic" in quotes as if it's not a real "thing".

And I wanted to discuss the the Potterwars situation (which was going on just as I came info fandom), which I've been trying to write about for a long time because it happened when fandom was extremely small compared to how it grew as the films were announced and GoF: The Book was released.

It was a significant moment for many of us who were fandom newbies - inspiration for us to tell the corporation no, we aren't going to mark all our fics with gay characters as R-rated - but the perspectives encapsulated in the article were very, very limited. There is an interesting oral history of the HP fandom, but this NY Times article isn't it.

If you want to read the article, it's here.

(no subject)

Date: 2011-07-03 12:21 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] teaberryblue.livejournal.com
I thought the "fanfic" in quotes was written like that as a sort of nod-nod-wink-wink-it's-really-smut thing, if that makes any sense?

(no subject)

Date: 2011-07-03 01:19 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] heidi8.livejournal.com
It's possible, and I did wonder that, but since fanfic isn't synonymous with smut, it feels a little oversnarky and disingenuous that they're trying to make that parallel.

(no subject)

Date: 2011-07-03 02:01 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] teaberryblue.livejournal.com
Oh, no, I don't think they're suggesting that all fanfic is smut. I think they're suggesting "We're not going to actually say smutfic and traumatize all the pearl-clutching types who make up the majority of NYT readership, so we're adding some quotes and those of you who understand what sort of story we're talking about will get it, and those who wish to go on casually and blissfully oblivious can read this sentence some other way."

(no subject)

Date: 2011-07-03 12:42 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] imaginarycircus.livejournal.com
The article back in like 2001 was what made me stop lurking. I remember that vividly.

(no subject)

Date: 2011-07-03 01:18 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] heidi8.livejournal.com
And I am so glad you did! Do you remember the not-insignificant amount of wank about the article itself, though, and the concern by some that The Powers That Be now knew about Fandom?

(no subject)

Date: 2011-07-03 02:00 pm (UTC)

June 2022

S M T W T F S
   123 4
567891011
12131415161718
19202122232425
2627282930  

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jan. 1st, 2026 09:23 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios