We have a problem with her.
Sep. 17th, 2008 01:10 pmGacked from
ellen_fremedon:
To quote a comment to ellen's post:
McCain people: No, Trig can't be Bristol's baby, because Bristol's pregnant!
Everyone else: Aaaaiieeeee!
McCain people: No, she didn't fire him because of her brother-in-law, she fired him because of rape kits and pork earmarks!
Everyone else: Aaaaiieeeee!
And, as a side note who's the senator who wrote the 1994 Violence Against Women act that mandated that states/municipalities not charge rape victims for the evidence-gathering kits?
That's Joe Biden.
Who voted against passage of the Violence Against Women act?
John McCain. Who now wants to criminalize embryonic stem cell research.
It turns out that one of the reasons cited by Sarah Palin for firing Public Safety Commissioner Walt Monegan-- the one who wouldn't fire her ex-brother-in-law-- were even worse than we thought:
She did it because Monegan was going to Washington to ask for money to combat sexual assault -- Alaska has more forcible rapes per capita than any other state in the Union -- and Palin didn't want Monegan's request to interfere with her earmarks requests going through now-indicted Senator Ted Stevens.
Palin does not deny this-- it's the explanation being put forward by McCain's own spokespeople:
The last straw, the McCain campaign said, was in July, when Monegan planned to travel to Washington to seek federal money for a plan to assign troopers, judges and prosecutors who could exclusively handle sexual assault cases — one of the state's most intractable crime problems.
In a July 7 e-mail, John Katz, the governor's special counsel, noted two problems with the trip: The governor hadn't agreed the money should be sought, and the request was "out of sequence with our other appropriations requests and could put a strain on the evolving relationship between the Governor and Sen. (Ted) Stevens."
Four days later, Monegan was fired. He said he had kept others in the administration fully apprised of his plans to go to Washington.
Just think about those key points there. She fired her Public Safety Commissioner for seeking money for rape prevention and prosecution-- which surely falls under Public Safety-- because she was afraid that money might come out of the trough that was funding the bridge to nowhere.
The AP has the full story.
To quote a comment to ellen's post:
McCain people: No, Trig can't be Bristol's baby, because Bristol's pregnant!
Everyone else: Aaaaiieeeee!
McCain people: No, she didn't fire him because of her brother-in-law, she fired him because of rape kits and pork earmarks!
Everyone else: Aaaaiieeeee!
And, as a side note who's the senator who wrote the 1994 Violence Against Women act that mandated that states/municipalities not charge rape victims for the evidence-gathering kits?
That's Joe Biden.
Who voted against passage of the Violence Against Women act?
John McCain. Who now wants to criminalize embryonic stem cell research.
(no subject)
Date: 2008-09-17 05:28 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2008-09-17 05:40 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2008-09-17 11:12 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2008-09-17 06:11 pm (UTC)How're you feeling?
(no subject)
Date: 2008-09-17 11:11 pm (UTC)As for election day, since I missed the last presidential election due to bed rest, this time I plan to vote by absentee ballot, just in case. If I don't end up on bed rest, then oh well, but if I do, I won't have to miss the election!
(no subject)
Date: 2008-09-17 05:34 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2008-09-17 05:50 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2008-09-17 06:12 pm (UTC)Am scared now.
(no subject)
Date: 2008-09-17 06:17 pm (UTC)It would be like this, right?
Date: 2008-09-17 06:22 pm (UTC)Re: It would be like this, right?
Date: 2008-09-17 06:43 pm (UTC)Re: It would be like this, right?
Date: 2008-09-17 06:55 pm (UTC)Re: It would be like this, right?
Date: 2008-09-17 06:51 pm (UTC)Re: It would be like this, right?
Date: 2008-09-17 08:19 pm (UTC)Re: It would be like this, right?
Date: 2008-09-17 08:46 pm (UTC)Re: It would be like this, right?
Date: 2008-09-19 05:59 am (UTC)May I borrow this for my most recent post?
*shivers*
Re: It would be like this, right?
Date: 2008-09-19 11:16 am (UTC)It is pretty fabulous, isn't it?
Re: It would be like this, right?
Date: 2008-09-19 06:56 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2008-09-17 06:50 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2008-09-17 07:03 pm (UTC)BTW, I'm home sick today, I never get on LJ at work!
(no subject)
Date: 2008-09-17 07:09 pm (UTC)I was pretty freaked out when I started four years ago, though not as much now. But SP scares me in general.
(no subject)
Date: 2008-09-17 05:50 pm (UTC)Also, as an aside, did anyone see Beau Biden on Leno last night? He was wonderful - and a great surrogate/ambassador for his dad and Barack, at least until he ships out to Iraq *wibbles*
(no subject)
Date: 2008-09-17 06:13 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2008-09-17 06:08 pm (UTC)btw, I think it's important to note that the reason that Palin didn't want Wasillia paying for the rape kits is the morning after pill they include, because she felt that it would be the state paying for contraception. Given that she doesn't believe in abortion even in cases of rape, at least she's consistent.
(no subject)
Date: 2008-09-17 06:17 pm (UTC)DO NOT WANT!
I do not dig her!
(no subject)
Date: 2008-09-17 06:13 pm (UTC)That's Joe Biden.
Who voted against passage of the Violence Against Women act?
John McCain.
That's something the Obama campaign needs to say loudly and often.
(no subject)
Date: 2008-09-17 06:33 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2008-09-17 08:48 pm (UTC)O le
P anderers
yep.
(no subject)
Date: 2008-09-17 06:36 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2008-09-17 06:37 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2008-09-17 06:45 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2008-09-17 06:56 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2008-09-17 07:26 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2008-09-17 06:45 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2008-09-17 07:02 pm (UTC)"A woman voting for Palin is like a chicken voting for Colonel Sanders. Yes, the Colonel loves chicken, just not in a way that is actually helpful to the chicken."
(no subject)
Date: 2008-09-17 07:06 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2008-09-17 08:48 pm (UTC)I need to make a macro icon of that.
(no subject)
Date: 2008-09-17 09:30 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2008-09-17 07:38 pm (UTC)Thanks for the link.
(no subject)
Date: 2008-09-17 08:14 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2008-09-17 08:49 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2008-09-17 09:39 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2008-09-17 11:43 pm (UTC)I think your (made of win) icon says it all for me.
(no subject)
Date: 2008-09-18 02:03 am (UTC)As for criminalizing Embryonic Stem Cell Research. I might be missing something, but he always was in favor of criminalizing the creation of EST for the purposes of research. His comment about morals was precisely what he wanted it to be; ambiguous enough to try and please both sides.
He has said in the past that he would approve increases in Federal Funding for EST, but I haven't heard if that also means he would go along with increasing the number of cell lines used for that purpose, one that Bush put at a ridiculously low number that caused problems because a great many were unusable (too lazy at the moment to go look up exact figures and it doesn't add to my point anyway). :)
Whether or not McCain can be held to his word on anything is an entirely different matter, but I don't see this as a shift in his position on EST.
(no subject)
Date: 2008-09-18 08:33 am (UTC)What rapes aren't forced?
(no subject)
Date: 2008-09-18 09:18 am (UTC)