There are only...
Jul. 26th, 2005 04:38 pmWhen Dumbledore and Harry were in the Weasley broomshed, Dumbledore said that the only two people in the world who knew the contents of the prophecy were the two of them.
Does that mean that the Longbottom parents don't know the contents of it? And if they don't, did James & Lily? Or have they just forgotten in their madness?
Or am I overanalyzing something she didn't give that much plotting to?
(no subject)
Date: 2005-07-26 08:42 pm (UTC)Yeah, I suppose the Longbottoms have forgotten. I mean, Alice doesn't recognize her own son anymore, so...
In all honesty, yeah, probably, we're all overanalyzing on stuff. Did you see Mugglenet's latest poll? Maybe it's just me, but the majority of the fandom seems to think that there was something behind Snape killing Dumbledore, but the poll says that the non-fandom fans don't. Hmm...
(no subject)
Date: 2005-07-26 08:44 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2005-07-26 08:46 pm (UTC)Interesting that it does mean the Order doesn't know the full content though, and were willing to guard it anyway!
(no subject)
Date: 2005-07-26 08:50 pm (UTC)I think that shows how much the Order trusts Dumbledore; I mean, like you said, they didn't know anything about the prophecy, yet they guarded it because Dumbledore said it was important.
(no subject)
Date: 2005-07-26 09:14 pm (UTC)Yes. I think the Order knows other things... which we do not know... which lead to that trust.
In fact, I think that's the reason it's called the Order of the Phoenix.
(no subject)
Date: 2005-07-26 09:17 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2005-07-26 09:23 pm (UTC)One of the reasons the second and third books are my favorites is the unbroken third-person limited. It requires the author to work harder, to get the reader all the relevant information, but when it works, it works very well.
(no subject)
Date: 2005-07-26 09:24 pm (UTC)I have to agree with that. :) When you realize how much more effort it takes for the author to do that, you appreciate it more, and the writing seems (and is) much better.
(no subject)
Date: 2005-07-26 09:28 pm (UTC)It really is.
Another of my favorite English writers, Wodehouse, does first person better than anyone ever, in my opinion. He has these hideously complex plots and is absolutely painstaking and rigorous in the execution of information flow... despite the huge authorial limitations of first person.
One interesting exercise would be to rewrite a HP book entirely in first and still get in the whole plot, logically and cleanly. Or, even better, rewrite bits of HBP so those first two chapters are unncessary and the perspective is uninterrupted.
(no subject)
Date: 2005-07-26 09:39 pm (UTC)Now that is an accomplishment. ::admires::
That would be a great challenge for someone who wants to improve their writing. Maybe I'll try it sometime...
(no subject)
Date: 2005-07-27 12:12 am (UTC)It was on the Hard Drive that died.
(no subject)
Date: 2005-07-27 02:27 pm (UTC)That must have been rather frustrating... :(
(no subject)
Date: 2005-07-26 09:34 pm (UTC)Why? Because as far as Dumbledore knew at that time, no infant was about to challenge Lord Volde and it was all together possible that these two families would be in hiding for many many years and raising their sons (and any other children) while in hiding and I think Dumbledore would see it as essential for these parents to not, fear more than they should, to not see their child as something more than they should, and to not know more than they had to avoid them creatinga prophecy paradox--like Voldemort did when he went after Harry. It's hard enough for parents to not think the world of their child--imagine how hard it'd have been if they knew the full prophecy?
(no subject)
Date: 2005-07-26 09:39 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2005-07-27 01:54 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2005-07-27 02:28 pm (UTC)