(no subject)
Jul. 17th, 2005 05:08 am1. So Book Six can be translated to Harry Potter & Severus Snape, then?
Huh.
2. If what Harry wishes/expects at the end of Book 6 comes to pass, then book seven is "post hogwarts" and it'll turn out I was right in saying that I didn't ship any of the trio with anyone else of the trio at Hogwarts. Again, huh.
(no subject)
Date: 2005-07-17 09:12 am (UTC)It's all about Snaco baby! Woooooooo!!!
(no subject)
Date: 2005-07-17 09:22 am (UTC)Btw, I need to reply to your post re r/hr. We've both seen all the pre-hbp posts and even pre-ootp posts and fics which suppose that the two of them were snogging thru 4th year, or possibly fifth, but certainly would be in sixth, to realise that all such claims were flat-out wrong, despite being oft-touted as the only reasonable readings of said books, and I think it's clear now - they were just extrapolations - perfectly reasonable ones, but nothing more than that. From my little "I still ship draco with those whose names begin with 'h'" zone, it's easy to say and see, but the only way the shippers will be able to walk into the sunset together is if eveyrone admits they've been wrong about some, if not most and if not all, of it.
Or something like that.
(no subject)
Date: 2005-07-17 09:32 am (UTC)Haaaaaa yeah I loved it! He wants all the glory but it's mine! Snaco all the way!
We've both seen all the pre-hbp posts and even pre-ootp posts and fics which suppose that the two of them were snogging thru 4th year, or possibly fifth, but certainly would be in sixth, to realise that all such claims were flat-out wrong
I wasn't in the fandom for OotP, but I have seen theories shot around that R/Hr might have messed around 4th or 5th year, I never saw anyone say it was set in canon(I'm sure some people did though!).
At this moment on shipping? I care and respect my H/Hr and trio shipping flist, but I made it clear that there was a reason why I didn't sign that shipper pledge that was going around. I'm walking into the sunset with the people on my flist, no one else.
The "I hate JKR for not sailing my ship" posts are killing me right now(no subject)
Date: 2005-07-17 11:58 pm (UTC)*Dies* Yeah, you pretty much nailed it. ♥
</drive-by comment>
(no subject)
Date: 2005-07-17 09:20 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2005-07-17 05:30 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2005-07-17 08:42 pm (UTC)You should be studying divination. :) Nicely done.
Draco*Harry*Snape
Date: 2005-07-17 12:00 pm (UTC)Hard to digest that book 7 is post-howarts. I think that will take a while for the brain to wrap around. Boot 7 was supposed to be NEWTS and Auror training and some kind of graduation ceremony.....wow. No Hogwarts...brain is over-heating.
Re: Draco*Harry*Snape
Date: 2005-07-17 12:04 pm (UTC)Re: Draco*Harry*Snape
Date: 2005-07-17 01:20 pm (UTC)Re: Draco*Harry*Snape
Date: 2005-07-17 01:30 pm (UTC)You do graduate on the Uni level and there's no wizarding Uni so they just might have something at the end of 7th as it's the end of their education. We just don't know.
Re: Draco*Harry*Snape
Date: 2005-07-17 01:55 pm (UTC)However, in my experience ( when I finally left school, I was at a school which had some of the hallmarks of the private school system in this country ) we had no special ceremony, just a lame tea party. I had to leave one school at sixteen ( no sixth form ), where we got up in assembly and mimed to that song from the end of Grease ( appropriate lyric) and then we had a tea party ( where we got given a little bell and I bawled my eyes out ) but there was no leaving ceremony as such. Therefore, I would strongly suspect that she does not see there being a ceremony.
One other, unrelated point. Everyone is assuming this last book will be post Hogwarts. I am really not so sure. I think he will find that he needs to be there to fulfil his destiny.
Re: Draco*Harry*Snape
Date: 2005-07-17 02:21 pm (UTC)I do think Harry will return to Hogwarts for something significant. He will probably need GG's sword, Faulkes, MM's advice, or something. But it is shocking to think Hermione will not be in school for year 7!
Re: Draco*Harry*Snape
Date: 2005-07-17 02:24 pm (UTC)I think the structure of the academic year ( September to July ) is what helps JKR when she writes. I think this last part of the story still has to be linked to that structure.
Re: Draco*Harry*Snape
Date: 2005-07-17 02:53 pm (UTC)i just cannot picture Hermione at school while Harry and Ron hunt w/o her. Harry said he would go 'home' as AD wanted then off to find the Horcruxes. Ron said they would be with him. After all - Harry is still considered an underage wizard. Ron and Hermione are of age and can do magic that Harry cannot. This will be tricky. Harry will need them.
Re: Draco*Harry*Snape
Date: 2005-07-17 01:55 pm (UTC)I know we have not ever been told of a graduation ceremony, but that just means Harry has never witnessed it. It would have to happen, right?
Re: Draco*Harry*Snape
Date: 2005-07-17 02:02 pm (UTC)pink floyd.
Date: 2005-07-17 02:33 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2005-07-17 03:15 pm (UTC)That's the whole book, isn't it? Harry's illusions crashing around his ears. His perfect teacher is Snape; Dumbledore will not always protect him; his life is not his own; it's time to stop being a schoolboy and start being a soldier.
2. ROFL. How like a lawyer to find a loophole *teases*
(no subject)
Date: 2005-07-17 03:54 pm (UTC)That's absolutely right. That's *it*. And this is why I love reading what you write. You gave me the AU I needed after OotP, and now that we have canon that doesn't, in and of itself break my heart there is only shiny anticipation.
(no subject)
Date: 2005-07-17 03:59 pm (UTC)And then the horrible end at the funeral where he realises he can't trust anyone and shouldn't have from the time he was a year old....
For me, the most terrifying moments in horror films are not where the monster is coming, fangs dripping blood and claws waving, but the moments where you have a sudden revelation that you are not safe behind a door and that walls are just plaster (like in Mouth Of Madness, when he's lying in bed and I'm all "oh good, he's safe" and then realise he's lying in bed in a hotel room where a homicidal maniac has keys to every room.) Harry hit that point; the point where he finally realises he is never going to be safe and no amount of blankets on the bed or locks on the door is going to stop anything.
(no subject)
Date: 2005-07-17 05:13 pm (UTC)He does seem to have realized that, but he's wrong (as usual -- see also his interpretation that Snape hated Dumbledore at the moment he killed him).
That Dumbledore is coming back from the dead, and that indeed his "death" is a totally orchestrated ploy designed to help keep Harry safe, is about as clear to me as the Ron/Hermione relationship always has been.
I'll even tell you what I think inspired the idea in JKR's head, despite the ultra cheese factor, and how it will play out, if you like.
(no subject)
Date: 2005-07-17 05:30 pm (UTC)Now, of course it's always possible that the AK was a fake, that he fell onto Buckbeak waiting below, and that the body is a spell-created fake, but....somehow I doubt it. JKR has a way of hammering home the finality of such things which makes one think she was thinking the fans would try such mental loopholes, and she's trying to smash them.
(no subject)
Date: 2005-07-17 05:55 pm (UTC)Not at all; he's endorsed resurrection aggressively for many years.
But there's no sense arguing this point, given that JKR will definitely address it one way or the other in the next book.
makes one think she was thinking the fans would try such mental loopholes, and she's trying to smash them.
My experience with the fans is that they are wonderfully capable of ignoring even the biggest loopholes.
The fourth book's entire plot, for instance, requires Crouch to be borderline retarded, and never realize he can simply ask Harry to touch a portkey the first day of school. The fans barely scratched that problem.
(no subject)
Date: 2005-07-17 11:33 pm (UTC)I'm intrigued though -- I can't recall Dumbledore even discussing resurrection, let alone endorsing it, but then as I've said, I'm not a great one for re-reading the books. How do you come by that theory? Other than Fawkes, of course, but for Fawkes resurrection is natural -- for humans it is not.