(no subject)
Jul. 15th, 2005 01:04 pm: pimps
bear's new iSpell icons Hee! Now, to convince her to put all of them into one icon together, whee.
It's only 10 am here - I have FOURTEEN HOURS before I could even comprehend getting the book legally, sigh. And I spent a little time this morning passing on info to The Powers That Be regarding an illegal radio contest in Tampa, Florida, which they managed to shut down with moments to go by threatening a suit against the station's parent corporation, Clear Channel, who are big enough to know better, but then again, I've found Clear Channel galactically stupid regarding the intellectual property rights of anyone but themselves.
Here's the thing - while I am not perfectly sure that the books can be considered unpublished anywhere in the world, these days, once they are officially on sale in the UK, I do think that until they are officially released there, they need to be considered under the copyright laws as they apply to unpublished works in the US, which means that infringement of them is addressed under a tighter and more protective standard than it is for works that are published. Once the books are published, the chapter titles merit no copyright protection, but until then, they do; once the books are published, fair use vests for purposes of parody, criticism and commentary, as well as educational purposes, but until then, they're in the same category as, say, JD Salinger's private letters. I know not all lawyers agree with that theory, but it's the only one that's viabe under current law, IMO. It's like the difference between your LJ posts which are set to private and the ones that, like this, are set to public.
But I am *so* sure that none of you are interested in law. I'm only babbling because some of you get the book in SIX HOURS and some of you in ELEVEN and I am still FOURTEEN hours away. WOE! WAH! WIBBLE!
I'll probably be spamming LJ out of boredom all day. Don't worry, no spoilers here, at least not for MORE THAN HALF A DAY MORE.
Silly left coast.
zorb, I now know your pain.
It's only 10 am here - I have FOURTEEN HOURS before I could even comprehend getting the book legally, sigh. And I spent a little time this morning passing on info to The Powers That Be regarding an illegal radio contest in Tampa, Florida, which they managed to shut down with moments to go by threatening a suit against the station's parent corporation, Clear Channel, who are big enough to know better, but then again, I've found Clear Channel galactically stupid regarding the intellectual property rights of anyone but themselves.
Here's the thing - while I am not perfectly sure that the books can be considered unpublished anywhere in the world, these days, once they are officially on sale in the UK, I do think that until they are officially released there, they need to be considered under the copyright laws as they apply to unpublished works in the US, which means that infringement of them is addressed under a tighter and more protective standard than it is for works that are published. Once the books are published, the chapter titles merit no copyright protection, but until then, they do; once the books are published, fair use vests for purposes of parody, criticism and commentary, as well as educational purposes, but until then, they're in the same category as, say, JD Salinger's private letters. I know not all lawyers agree with that theory, but it's the only one that's viabe under current law, IMO. It's like the difference between your LJ posts which are set to private and the ones that, like this, are set to public.
But I am *so* sure that none of you are interested in law. I'm only babbling because some of you get the book in SIX HOURS and some of you in ELEVEN and I am still FOURTEEN hours away. WOE! WAH! WIBBLE!
I'll probably be spamming LJ out of boredom all day. Don't worry, no spoilers here, at least not for MORE THAN HALF A DAY MORE.
Silly left coast.
(no subject)
Date: 2005-07-15 05:14 pm (UTC)Actually, I'm totally interested in IP law. heh. ^_-
So what was the deal with the radio station? Were they broadcasting chapter titles?
(no subject)
Date: 2005-07-15 05:17 pm (UTC)Wait, I am! Especially in regards to the details of an illegal contest at the hands of the Evil Emprire, er, I mean Clear Channel. What happened? :)
(no subject)
Date: 2005-07-15 05:59 pm (UTC)Also, what lj style do you have?
(no subject)
Date: 2005-07-15 06:45 pm (UTC)As for the LJ style, I have no idea. I guess whatever the default style happens to be. I've never tangled with it.
(no subject)
Date: 2005-07-15 05:22 pm (UTC)I'm curious, though -- if copyright subsists at the moment of creation, why do fair use protections not vest until publication? (I guess I'm looking for the policy rationale.)
(no subject)
Date: 2005-07-15 05:24 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2005-07-15 05:53 pm (UTC)Assuming "publication" is found where the general public has obtained a possessory interest in the work, could you make an argument that publication occurs when someone pre-orders the book on Amazon? (Assuming, of course, that Amazon charges your credit card right away -- not sure about how that works, as I've never pre-ordered.) After all, by entering a contract for sale supported by consideration, you have acquired a vested future possessory interest in the book. Is that sufficient? Or does publication require a present possessory interest?
(no subject)
Date: 2005-07-15 08:43 pm (UTC)Thinking about Harry Potter is WAY more fun than studying.
(no subject)
Date: 2005-07-15 10:00 pm (UTC)But if the promise to purchase *was* binding (or if they took the money at the time of ordering), some possessory interest would vest at that moment, yeah?
Ugh. I HATE contracts questions.
Thinking about Harry Potter is WAY more fun than studying.
DUDE. YES.
If I fail the bar exam, it will be because I am BORED OUT OF MY MIND and consequently lack motivation to do anything. Studying would be infinitely better if it were all somehow fandom related. Which is why I just spent twenty fascinating minutes contemplating this question while the sample essays make me want to stab my eyes out.
(no subject)
Date: 2005-07-15 10:07 pm (UTC)It's so unfair that after three years of tedious hard work, they make us spend an addition two months doing even more tedious hard work! What state are you studying for?
(no subject)
Date: 2005-07-15 05:24 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2005-07-15 05:50 pm (UTC)Does Dave have my number? Going to movie later--will have to turn phone off. I don't want him to think I'm snubbing him or anything. Maybe we can meet for pizza or Chinese.
panicky artist
Date: 2005-07-15 05:57 pm (UTC)Re: panicky artist
Date: 2005-07-15 06:58 pm (UTC)Re: panicky artist
Date: 2005-07-15 07:30 pm (UTC)I posted the art in a locked journle for your eyes only, here:
http://www.livejournal.com/users/ani_bester/265438.html
Hopefully that will work.
If you the sidekick stops letting you reply, err I'm not sure what to do. I could give you my cell number 0.o
Re: panicky artist
Date: 2005-07-15 08:26 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2005-07-15 07:29 pm (UTC)I was ticked when I heard that.
(no subject)
Date: 2005-07-15 07:37 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2005-07-15 09:02 pm (UTC)*bows down in admiration*
Clear Channel is teh suck.
(no subject)
Date: 2005-07-15 10:44 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2005-07-17 03:11 am (UTC)I made my mother tell me mock court cases instead of bed time stories when I was little. Trust me, I found you comments very interesting.