(no subject)
Sep. 18th, 2004 01:45 pmThe new cover of Entertainment Weekly is so cute; it's a 1977 photo of Luke and Leia and Han and Chewbaca and it's just wonderful. I think they should've switched to a 70s style font for the magazine title and just gone with the mood.
And Dalton Ross did a wonderful 10 Things We Didn't Know, where he gets gleefully snarky. I would love to watch these three DVDs with Dalton chatting over my shoulder because he would *get it*. So would Kevin Smith, whose reaction to the changes is something I would love to know as well.
I am undecided about buying the DVDs, myself. I do own the Originals, pre-1997t-weaks, on VHS, but how long will they last? Sigh, maybe I should get these and just resolve not to unbox them unless and until my VHS versions die. Or maybe I should get them and watch them and save the original VHS ones for my boys, so they see the films as they were originally and so properly made.
George gave an interview to EW, and there was one question he was asked, where his answer really upset me, my sister, her husband and my husband.
EW: Say that it's 2010 and I'm a 10 year old coming to Star Wars movies for the first time. Should I start with IV or I?
GL: Your order should be I, II, III, IV, V, VI. Part of hte fun for me is that one generaiton will have seen it backwqards. For the next generation that sees it from I to VI, there are a lot of things in IV that were just fantastic [in 1977... But] what's really important is hte story and hte development of the characters. Now, once you get to IV, you know Darth Vadar's hte main character because you saw him [in previous movies]. So when Sarth Vadar walks in, you say, Oh, my God. Now, when you come across Princess Leia you know that's his daughter right away and you htink, doe she know? No, he doesn't know. Or does he know? And when you cut down to the planet and see Luke, you go, oh my God, that's Darth Vadar's son and Ben Kenobi has been waiting all this time to send him on his adventures. You're waiting for them to realise who everybody is. So it is a completely different movie.
Then, I choked a bit, and realised, what this needs`
[Poll #352098]
And Dalton Ross did a wonderful 10 Things We Didn't Know, where he gets gleefully snarky. I would love to watch these three DVDs with Dalton chatting over my shoulder because he would *get it*. So would Kevin Smith, whose reaction to the changes is something I would love to know as well.
I am undecided about buying the DVDs, myself. I do own the Originals, pre-1997t-weaks, on VHS, but how long will they last? Sigh, maybe I should get these and just resolve not to unbox them unless and until my VHS versions die. Or maybe I should get them and watch them and save the original VHS ones for my boys, so they see the films as they were originally and so properly made.
George gave an interview to EW, and there was one question he was asked, where his answer really upset me, my sister, her husband and my husband.
EW: Say that it's 2010 and I'm a 10 year old coming to Star Wars movies for the first time. Should I start with IV or I?
GL: Your order should be I, II, III, IV, V, VI. Part of hte fun for me is that one generaiton will have seen it backwqards. For the next generation that sees it from I to VI, there are a lot of things in IV that were just fantastic [in 1977... But] what's really important is hte story and hte development of the characters. Now, once you get to IV, you know Darth Vadar's hte main character because you saw him [in previous movies]. So when Sarth Vadar walks in, you say, Oh, my God. Now, when you come across Princess Leia you know that's his daughter right away and you htink, doe she know? No, he doesn't know. Or does he know? And when you cut down to the planet and see Luke, you go, oh my God, that's Darth Vadar's son and Ben Kenobi has been waiting all this time to send him on his adventures. You're waiting for them to realise who everybody is. So it is a completely different movie.
Then, I choked a bit, and realised, what this needs`
[Poll #352098]
(no subject)
Date: 2004-09-18 11:03 am (UTC)That said, I have a weird opinion on I and II - I love them. I mean, I know they suck, believe me, but they are Star Wars and therefore I love them. Given a choice about what to watch, I wouldn't pick either one (unless I was in the mood for some Ewan-and-Hayden eye candy), but I am doomed to love them, irregardless of quality, simply because of what they are.
But I still think you have to start with IV, because if you start with I and II, you'll never *want* to watch the last three. :p And because that's how I did it, and the old school way is still the best way.
(no subject)
Date: 2004-09-18 11:15 am (UTC)Also agreed on the order. I think it's more fun to watch them "backwards" and then catch all the references in the prequels. They have more impact when you know the d00m and gl00m that's coming. And you get to go "OMG EMPEROR!" at the Palpatine profile.
(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
Date: 2004-09-18 11:09 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2004-09-18 11:17 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2004-09-18 12:13 pm (UTC)(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
Date: 2004-09-18 11:20 am (UTC)There are systems to transfer VHS to DVD. However, they're usually used for home video, not purchased video. But if you find someone with a system that can do it, they might be willing to give it a shot.
And if you wanted to...I have a set up for running copies of tapes (or, well, I can in about 15 minutes...I just have to drag the equipment out of my closet and run the cords). The quality degrades a bit (since most VHS tapes have blocks)...but it might save you having to watch the originals *all* the time.
Of course I don't condone copying and selling tapes. I mostly use the equipment for running copies of my seaQuest tapes (which get watched so heavily that they decay every few years on me and need run onto fresh tape) and for making home video collages as gifts for relatives.
But yeah, there are ways to save the originals that do not involve the cooperation of George Lucas.
(no subject)
Date: 2004-09-18 11:38 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2004-09-18 11:41 am (UTC)That being said, I have no plans to buy the DVDs even though I don't think they mutilated Empire too badly.
(no subject)
Date: 2004-09-18 11:41 am (UTC)So all in all I think I can say that Hayden is hot, yet clueless, the scripts of the prequels are mostly stupid, I want Portman's AOTC wardrobe and George is a megalomaniac.
(no subject)
Date: 2004-09-18 11:48 am (UTC)As for the order - a 10 year old has a different view of what's 'bad' than an adult. I would allow him to see the full series: 4, 5, 6, 1, 2, 3 just so he gets to see the full story like everyone else. 1, 2, 3 may suck in comparison to 4, 5, 6, but as long as they are not *inappropriate* for his age, then that's kind of up to him to decide, isn't it?
(no subject)
Date: 2004-09-18 12:16 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2004-09-18 11:52 am (UTC)IV, V, VI, I, II, III, IV, V, VI
But now I'm hearing that in the newest version of V, the cat's out of the bag fairly early on, regarding the Big Shock.
So now it's: Old VHS IV, V, VI, DVD I, II, III, and then DVD IV, V, VI just for the sake of completion. :(
I also voted on a "forgotten" evil. I mean, besides the rumored Not-Such-A-Big-Shock-After-All thing I mentioned above. Uh...yeah: Ewan's reshoot wigs and facial hair. Rather off-putting and I'm sure not entirely George's fault but still. :-P
Oh, and I guess I never really minded the Ewoks and now, especially after Jar-Jar Binks.
I see now that I mostly have issues with the prequels.
(no subject)
Date: 2004-09-18 12:21 pm (UTC)Oh no. What, exactly, do you mean? Did he change the final "I am your father" scene?!?!?!?! Please tell me that he didn't!!! O_o
(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
Date: 2004-09-18 12:39 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2004-09-18 01:04 pm (UTC)(no subject)
From:(no subject)
Date: 2004-09-18 12:42 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2004-09-18 12:42 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2004-09-18 01:05 pm (UTC)(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
Date: 2004-09-18 01:04 pm (UTC)Why not wait until all 6 movies come out on one DVD set with all the special features and commentaries? :-)
(no subject)
Date: 2004-09-18 01:20 pm (UTC)V was almost as good as IV, but VI had all that schmaltz at the end. I didn't mind the Ewoks as much when I first saw them, but then the spinoffs and merchandising started. The more childlike and cutesy they got the more I loathed them.
I was the nadir, but II, I thought, at least had a better plot, and Hayden may be evil but at least half the fault goes to the person who wrote his lines. II also went far toward making me rethink ever liking the Jedi Order...
(no subject)
Date: 2004-09-18 01:24 pm (UTC)Oh, and you did miss an evil:
He totally changed and screwed up Boba Fett's back story >_<.
That is what ticked me off the most about Episode 2.
(no subject)
Date: 2004-09-18 01:25 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2004-09-18 09:35 pm (UTC)George has been attriting as he's found out how much more work it is, I think.
Am I the only one, especially after the Hobbits' comments about visiting the Lucasfilm sets, who thinks George has made his THX1138 world something of his reality?
(no subject)
From:(no subject)
Date: 2004-09-18 02:15 pm (UTC)The movies should be viewed 4, 5, 6, 1, 2, 3. It doesn't matter which versions kids watch. Whichever one they get, that's THEIR Star Wars. One of the main reasons I believe George should release both is for the older generation who treasure the ORIGINAL versions. He forgets that as soon as Star Wars hit it big, the films no longer belonged to him. They belonged to the public. What he's doing now-- changing them and saying they're the "definative" SW movies is disrespectful to our collective memories.
George's problem is George. I think, even back in 1977, he was a major control freak who had no respect for his actors. He thought that the movies were HIS and HIS ALONE. Well, no... He had hundred and hundreds of people working on them. He didn't even DIRECT two of the movies. Yet still he believes nothing he does is wrong, because he came up with the idea in the first place. Only now he has people agreeing with him that, yes, he owns it all and can do whatever he wants. The voices of the "little people" don't matter.
I also have a huge problem with the addition of Gungans to the celebration scene in ROTJ. Apparently, they shout "Wesa free!" during the celebration on Coruscant.
(no subject)
Date: 2004-09-18 02:20 pm (UTC)You could try tracking down the THX remastered VHS versions that they released back before the "Special Editions" came out. The only difference between those and the original originals is slightly better video and sound quality - we have a set of these at my house, since the old tapes were starting to get a little worm down (both my brother and I first watched the movies at a very young age) :-).
As for George's answer: boooo. Half the fun of Star Wars was not knowing the twists
and watching it after you find out Luke and Leia were siblings.(no subject)
Date: 2004-09-18 02:33 pm (UTC)But the films are appalling. The actors are horribly directed--I don't blame Hayden; I blame George. Look, when even Ewan McGregor and Samuel L. Jackson suck in a film, it's NOT THE ACTORS' FAULT. He clearly doesn't give a s**t about the actors. The dialogue doesn't fill in enough of the story--or it's annoyingly redundant. ("Ani...What's wrong?" says Padme, an hour after his mother's death. Jeezus. "I've failed you, my lady," says Padme's dying double. Uh, no, the whole point is that she's done exactly what she was supposed to.) Sure, the film is staggeringly beautiful, but it's like eating terrible food in a pretty restaurant.
And then there's Jar Jar Binks. *full-body shudder* My jaw has never fully closed after his appearance on-screen, I'm tellin ya.
(no subject)
Date: 2004-09-18 02:38 pm (UTC)(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
Date: 2004-09-18 03:46 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2004-09-18 04:00 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2004-09-18 07:14 pm (UTC)Still, I can't believe George actually thinks it's better to watch them from 1 on. First, you're going to risk losing a lot of your audience that way. And really, knowing the past doesn't make the second three all that much more exciting (you find out the most exciting revelations in them so knowing beforehand takes that away). In fact, watching the original trilogy first gives you the few good parts of the new trilogy because you can say, "Hey, that kid's Boba Fett? Look, it's Artoo!"
(no subject)
Date: 2004-09-19 06:58 am (UTC)Insisting on directing the prequels was pure, unredeemable evil.
(no subject)
Date: 2004-09-19 07:05 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2004-09-19 01:09 pm (UTC)Marry me have my ewok jedi babies.
I like the ewoks. They were a great idea, that unfortunately went far too cutesy. Consider: a small very hostile (anthropophagic!) forest people that have to be won over to help the desperate good guys. In the novel, Leia gets them to help with the line "Do it for the trees." It's a cool concept, but the ewoks were too cute to pull it off.
Hayden's not bad. He's pretty, he's sulky and he has dimples on his butt. Much of it is the dialogue. At least Han and Leia got decent romace dialogue (cribbed verbatim from Rhett & Scarlett).
I agree that giving a control freak, and Lucas is an control-freak of the first water, complete authority and unlimited technology is a recipe for disaster.
(no subject)
Date: 2004-09-19 06:20 pm (UTC)