Tested by completely independent incorruptible testers? with independently certified 'original' and 'new model' DNA samples? using a completely transparent and publicised protocol?
Maybe, maybe just then I might begin to credit the results. And that's still a 'maybe'. There's been far too much bad 'DNA identification' evidence accepted by the courts already.
And even that's granting that they haven't actually had him tucked away for months already while they exploit the situation.
Unduly sceptical? I don't think so. With governments like that, I think it's nothing but sensible to doubt their every word, their every action.
![[identity profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/openid.png){kind=small}
![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
branchandroot
(no subject)
Date: 2003-12-14 03:30 pm (UTC)Maybe, maybe just then I might begin to credit the results. And that's still a 'maybe'. There's been far too much bad 'DNA identification' evidence accepted by the courts already.
And even that's granting that they haven't actually had him tucked away for months already while they exploit the situation.
Unduly sceptical? I don't think so. With governments like that, I think it's nothing but sensible to doubt their every word, their every action.