(no subject)
Sep. 28th, 2003 01:33 pmYou know what my problem is about the daily star report re: r/hr in the poa film?
Their use of the phrase 'sex up'. And not just because I think that term applied to 13 year olds is inappropriate (yes, I do feel that way. 15? 16? Not so much. But 13? Hell, yes).
But because I'll bet fifty galleons that the self same paper and the reasers who don't blanch at such a statement would be horribly critical of snogfics set in the poa timeframe, or even ootp, because they're for kids.
Am I being too pre-judgmental?
Their use of the phrase 'sex up'. And not just because I think that term applied to 13 year olds is inappropriate (yes, I do feel that way. 15? 16? Not so much. But 13? Hell, yes).
But because I'll bet fifty galleons that the self same paper and the reasers who don't blanch at such a statement would be horribly critical of snogfics set in the poa timeframe, or even ootp, because they're for kids.
Am I being too pre-judgmental?
(no subject)
Date: 2003-09-28 01:48 pm (UTC)I agree with you on the phrase sex up. 13 year olds don't sex it up. That's just wrong.
(no subject)
Date: 2003-09-28 01:50 pm (UTC)Actually I'm a big R/Hr fan and I kind of had a knee jerk reaction to the "sexed up" term. I mean they're 13 years old! But I think that's just the paper being sensational and blowing it out of porportion. I'm guessing when the film's released that the actual 'romantic tension' (or whatever it is) will be much more subtle than the article makes it out to be.
(no subject)
Date: 2003-09-28 01:50 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2003-09-28 01:52 pm (UTC)Daily Mail
Daily Star
Daily Mirror
????
(no subject)
Date: 2003-09-28 02:01 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2003-09-28 02:32 pm (UTC)LEAST WORST
Daily Mirror
The Sun
Daily Star
Daily Mail
I'D HAVE TO PUT IN SOME MORE HTML TAGS AT THE BOTTOM OF THAT "PERSONAL HELL" MEME TO PLACE IT PROPERLY
...though if the Daily Mail can get me to the USA and back for just the cost of taxes, fees and 35 rags of seething hate and bile then I shall forgive it. Just about.
(I would've put The Currant Bun above the Mirror had it not been for that "Bonkers Bruno Locked Up" debacle last week. Way to lose friends and badly influence people, guys...)
(no subject)
Date: 2003-09-29 12:31 am (UTC)I still haven't forgiven the Currant Bun for their Hillsborough coverage, for that matter.
And why has no-one decided to villify the Daily Express while we're at it?
(no subject)
Date: 2003-09-29 01:53 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2003-09-29 02:25 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2003-09-28 01:53 pm (UTC)And I think you're right - they would blanch at it, and they'd be against slash, even non sexual slash. Such is the way of life, I guess.
(no subject)
Date: 2003-09-28 01:56 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2003-09-28 01:58 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2003-09-28 02:03 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2003-09-28 02:13 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2003-09-28 02:18 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2003-09-28 02:58 pm (UTC)I thought the same thing, actually (and I'm hoping it proves to be the case). But it pisses me off anyway, you know? Because I wouldn't put it past Hollywood. Heidi's point is well taken: 15 or 16 year olds? Okay, that's different. But *thirteen* year olds? It really makes me cringe.
(no subject)
Date: 2003-09-28 02:21 pm (UTC)Cuaron: Okay, Emma, Rupert, we added this scene in order to sex things up. So if you'll just- wait, don't start blushing yet, that's later in the sce- hey, where are you going? Come back!
*chases after fleeing young actors*
(no subject)
Date: 2003-09-28 02:21 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2003-09-28 03:13 pm (UTC)Even when I was the same age as
And...you hire the director of Y Tu Mama Tambien, what do you really expect?
*I am huge diegolunatic*
However, Ron and Hermione are NOT having sex, and I hope they never do, so I hope that this is a complete fabrication. The #1 thing I was happy about OOTP, was that I did NOT have to read the R/Hr I had feared.
(no subject)
Date: 2003-09-30 06:47 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2003-09-30 07:00 pm (UTC)Your British cultural correspondent comments
Date: 2003-09-28 02:28 pm (UTC)The phrase "sex up" is rather in vogue at the moment and is prone to being used rather more figuratively than literally these days. The issue is that there was an allegation that the government may have, using this precise phrase, "sexed up" its assessment of Iraq's arsenal, notably by possibly having included a claim that Saddam would have been ready to use his weapons of mass destruction at 45 minutes' notice, to buttress the case for war. There's an article about the phrase in the Boston Globe and the conclusion of the report (er) reported on Yahoo! News.
Really pretty much everything that could possibly be sexed up has been sexed up over the last few months, particularly the last few weeks, without sex necessarily having anything to do with it whatsoever - particularly by the more sensationalist, ahem, of the media such as your Ooh Ahh Daily Star.
(no subject)
Date: 2003-09-28 02:51 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2003-09-28 02:54 pm (UTC)Actually, the whole article is BS in my opinion...I mean, it's the Daily Star. Are we really going to take it all that seriously?
(no subject)
Date: 2003-09-28 02:55 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2003-09-28 05:01 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2003-09-28 05:34 pm (UTC)So, no, you're not being too pre-judgemental, but I'm still a bit hesitant to believe that article.
(no subject)
Date: 2003-09-28 06:52 pm (UTC)~Erin