(no subject)
Oct. 23rd, 2002 01:14 pmMy favorite quote of the day:
Chris Columbus in the Leaky Cauldron interview yesterday:
...Peter Travers in Rolling Stone said, 'I can't criticize this movie, because it's so corporate.' And I'm thinking, you have people, Oscar-winning production designers, cameramen, myself, just busting their chops to get this film done, and you're saying it's a corporate machine. It's just not the case...
I think this is close to the same thing I think when people say that FA is too clean, too corporate, when we've got all these talented and artistic people busting their chops to make a site that's fun and easy to use. Of course, the film has the added issue of being a product of AOL-TW, which is one of the larger and more hated companies in the world... which of course FA doesn't have as an issue, but it's more the feeling. I don't know, I feel like that quote sometimes.
Chris Columbus in the Leaky Cauldron interview yesterday:
...Peter Travers in Rolling Stone said, 'I can't criticize this movie, because it's so corporate.' And I'm thinking, you have people, Oscar-winning production designers, cameramen, myself, just busting their chops to get this film done, and you're saying it's a corporate machine. It's just not the case...
I think this is close to the same thing I think when people say that FA is too clean, too corporate, when we've got all these talented and artistic people busting their chops to make a site that's fun and easy to use. Of course, the film has the added issue of being a product of AOL-TW, which is one of the larger and more hated companies in the world... which of course FA doesn't have as an issue, but it's more the feeling. I don't know, I feel like that quote sometimes.
(no subject)
Date: 2002-10-23 10:31 am (UTC)best site on the internet dammit
(no subject)
Date: 2002-10-23 04:03 pm (UTC)nekkid in public
Date: 2002-10-23 04:04 pm (UTC)actually i think it is more of a tease...
Re: nekkid in public
Date: 2002-10-23 10:31 pm (UTC)But enough of that.
If being on-topic all the time, moderated, supportive, etc. makes FA corporate, I say bring it on. I love FA for its lack of all things netspeak, one-liner, and generally stupid. A fandom as huge as this needs moderation and a little smackdown sometimes. Corporations get things done. Sometimes there's just no way around it. Everyone screaming about "corporate this and corporate that is evil, yada yada yada" can take themselves and go live in a hut in the Hundred Acre Wood.
Oooh, harsh. And maybe a little too straightforward. But honest.
Re: nekkid in public
Date: 2002-10-24 05:54 am (UTC)And you should have seen the guy who played John the Baptist in a loincloth when I saw Salome in LA a few years ago. Wow. It may have ruined all other Salomes.
And the fun historical note for the day: Richard Strauss said that the fifth veil definitely comes off, but he kind of threw up his hands after that. Now, since we are in less restrictive times, all seven come off.
Amy, who compliments cedar85 on having very, very good taste in music
Re: nekkid in public
Date: 2002-10-24 06:51 am (UTC)haven't had coffee. but yes - I have hear Salome many times. never seen it though. And er, I knew Salome danced - had no idea her dance was the dance of the seven veils. must reserach this methinks.
and anyway - I stiil love FA enough to do said dance even if it means being nekkid in public. And I have to say I am rather modest. Not at all the sort who would do that anyway.
How come...
You can TELL when something is produced just to cater to the market or just to make money. There is a lot of that out there, trust me. I don't think the HP movies and FA are in this category by a long shot.
And where does a Rolling Stone reviewer get off on making those sorts of comments anyway, eh? Last time I checked, they had some major corporate and commercial players in their product too.
But oh, the music industry is all about integrity and is the ultimate non-corporate and non-commercial machine! Don't we know that? *cough*boybands*cough* *cough*girlbands*cough*
Stupid dorks.
Re: How come...
Date: 2002-10-23 11:46 am (UTC)Everytime someone does something that is creative, but is gorgeously done and works very well that it's considered "corporate" or "commercial"?
Jealousy. Pure jealousy. IMHO. Everybody likes to pick on the big guys.
*skips off*
Re: How come...
Date: 2002-10-23 01:01 pm (UTC)I can't think of anything more corporate than mainstream music. And I'm in radio. Assistant music director at the station. I deal with the record companies. Yeah. Music ain't corporate. And I just lost fifty pounds when writing that.
Sheesh.
FA isn't corporate, doll
Date: 2002-10-23 11:42 am (UTC)I have a new mantra for you: Must remember that formality and being corporate are two totally different things. Don't have to sell out to avoid being sued.
Chin up! Beat the server problems down! Call me about your bylaws!
Amy, who decided she didn't like the first, on-the-spot, full-of-pressure LJ name and has changed it
(no subject)
Of course, that has nothing to do with sheer size; it was always always like that. I know that you all set out, when you started the place, to have it be welcoming to all sorts of fics and conversations and I can say, having joined in December 01, that it always felt that way to me.
As for Peter Travers, he's one of those "golden age of the 70s" Paulette type reviewers. He likes his films handmade and his favourite director is probably Scorcese. Of course, Marty would give his left testicle to have a monster hit, which never occurs to guys like that. They entirely missed Kael's point, that something mass could be good. Moron.