Dear Ms Gabaldon
May. 4th, 2010 09:29 amre: your dismissal of fan-created works, which was weird, dismissive of Pulitzer prize winning works and other classics, and most frustrating to me, inaccurate regarding the legal issues (although, of course, what you feel is ethical or not is a decision that is entirely your call)
I have a question.
What would the first minute of the May 3 episode of Chuck, which sets the show to the classic opening of Hart to Hart, be?
What about when Richard Castle wears a costume from Firefly?
Or, in fact, all of Studio 60, which is a names-changed-RPF of Saturday Night Live?
What about when Supernatural names a demonic character after a character from Good Omens?
Where does all that factor into your world-view?
I really want to address the discussion of
help_haiti, but I am having a hard time doing so without crying. People - not just fanfic writers and fanartists and vidders and iconers but novelists and musicians from around the world - got together to do something positive to help people in need.
I was involved in both
help_haiti and Helping Haiti Heal - both were grass-roots projects and collectively, they raised about a quarter of a million dollars which went to Partners in Health, UNICEF, the Red Cross, Red Crescent, Yele and over a dozen more organizations. We sent five-plus planes full of supplies to Haiti this spring because of fannish efforts.
And both projects included thank-yous from fan-creators and notable authors. For example, Helping Haiti Heal's thank-yous included wizard rock memorabilia, and a signed set of Harry Potter books donated by JKR. It included fanart, and signed books from Neil Gaiman and Terry Pratchett. Naomi Novik donated the ability to name a character in an upcoming book of hers, and Melissa Anelli personalized copies of her book about the Harry Potter fandom.
Fans and creators came together to do something wonderful, and it helped lives.
Now, how is that like seduction of someone's husband (and, btw, doesn't it take two to tango? Nobody cheats unless they want to.) or for (oh my God I cannot believe this comparison) hell's sake how is that like rape or even taking flowers from a garden?
No, no author has to be as understanding of her fans' urge to create stories or art or vids based on her works as JK Rowling has been.
But I can think of at least a dozen women who, in the last decade, have written (or beta read) Harry Potter fanfic and gone on to publishing contracts and best-sellers and sales of the movie rights to their books - and I know a dozen more who're going to reach that milestone in the next year or two. Yes, people would still be writing Harry Potter fanfic even if JKR wasn't relatively okay with it, because it would still be transformative and fair use and since fair use is a lawful use of copyright...
And that's a good thing.
Oh, and I have one last question for Ms Gabaldon.
When people make icons that include bits of your book covers, how do you feel about that? Because I am really kind of curious...
I have a question.
What would the first minute of the May 3 episode of Chuck, which sets the show to the classic opening of Hart to Hart, be?
What about when Richard Castle wears a costume from Firefly?
Or, in fact, all of Studio 60, which is a names-changed-RPF of Saturday Night Live?
What about when Supernatural names a demonic character after a character from Good Omens?
Where does all that factor into your world-view?
I really want to address the discussion of
I was involved in both
And both projects included thank-yous from fan-creators and notable authors. For example, Helping Haiti Heal's thank-yous included wizard rock memorabilia, and a signed set of Harry Potter books donated by JKR. It included fanart, and signed books from Neil Gaiman and Terry Pratchett. Naomi Novik donated the ability to name a character in an upcoming book of hers, and Melissa Anelli personalized copies of her book about the Harry Potter fandom.
Fans and creators came together to do something wonderful, and it helped lives.
Now, how is that like seduction of someone's husband (and, btw, doesn't it take two to tango? Nobody cheats unless they want to.) or for (oh my God I cannot believe this comparison) hell's sake how is that like rape or even taking flowers from a garden?
No, no author has to be as understanding of her fans' urge to create stories or art or vids based on her works as JK Rowling has been.
But I can think of at least a dozen women who, in the last decade, have written (or beta read) Harry Potter fanfic and gone on to publishing contracts and best-sellers and sales of the movie rights to their books - and I know a dozen more who're going to reach that milestone in the next year or two. Yes, people would still be writing Harry Potter fanfic even if JKR wasn't relatively okay with it, because it would still be transformative and fair use and since fair use is a lawful use of copyright...
And that's a good thing.
Oh, and I have one last question for Ms Gabaldon.
When people make icons that include bits of your book covers, how do you feel about that? Because I am really kind of curious...
(no subject)
Date: 2010-05-04 01:34 pm (UTC)Diane Gabaldon got the idea for Jamie from watching Doctor Who and seeing another redheaded kilted man named Jamie.
At heart, in some form, everything she has written in that universe has been a transformative work.
She is pissing on the roots of her own tree, and it isn't cool.
(no subject)
Date: 2010-05-04 01:39 pm (UTC)You know I love you, right? This just makes me love you more.
*hugs*
(no subject)
Date: 2010-05-04 01:41 pm (UTC)And the sad thing? I used to be such a big fan of hers! But now I've lost a great deal of respect for her. I really hope she'll come to her senses and post some sort of retraction/apology.
(no subject)
Date: 2010-05-04 01:57 pm (UTC)Trekkies in Star Fleet uniforms = copyright infringement... why don't they make up their OWN futuristic pangalactic governmental systems and leave Roddenberry's alone?
Ugh.
(no subject)
Date: 2010-05-04 02:04 pm (UTC)i think this is an awesome and important response. <3 Oh, and I also think no post about fandom & charity should go without mentioning the work thousands do each year to raise money for RAINN in the Sweet Charity project.
(no subject)
Date: 2010-05-04 02:11 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2010-05-04 02:28 pm (UTC)I'm so glad I do not know of this woman. I would make a voodoo doll of her.
Really, you have to give mad props to the Supernatural people - never in the history of television (that I've heard of, correct me if I'm wrong)has a show been so open and supportive of its fandom. Castle is another great example - they've already given their fans lots of nods, and it's great. It builds a relationship between the fans and the show that wouldn't be there otherwise. I mean, look at 5.9!! O.o
People with that attitude don't truly understand art, imo.
Also, the Pulitzer prize list got me thinking about music. How many award winning songs copied a riff or melody from an older song? O.o ALL OF THEM.
(no subject)
Date: 2010-05-04 02:28 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2010-05-04 02:42 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2010-05-04 02:53 pm (UTC)But anyway. There is no measure big enough for the amount of fail there. and now, I will never read her books, even though I might have enjoyed them.
(no subject)
Date: 2010-05-04 02:58 pm (UTC)Her post is one of the more ridiculous things I've read in recent weeks, and I love this response to it.
(no subject)
Date: 2010-05-04 03:02 pm (UTC)I'd LOVE to hear her response to this.
Thank you for this.
*gives you pink cotton candy*
(no subject)
Date: 2010-05-04 03:18 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2010-05-04 04:39 pm (UTC)Hence not finishing the article. But if anyone asks me to weigh in on the subject, I plan on linking them here.
(no subject)
Date: 2010-05-04 04:41 pm (UTC)This is completely bitchy and doesn't address your points, but after spending all day in the car ROLLING MY EYES OUT OF MY HEAD over her work, I couldn't not comment.
(no subject)
Date: 2010-05-04 04:41 pm (UTC)And you can’t use someone’s copyrighted characters for your own purposes, no matter what those purposes are.
Really? REALLY??? Did it occur to this woman to even do a GOOGLE SEARCH before she posted this rant?
(no subject)
Date: 2010-05-04 04:49 pm (UTC)*shakes head*
(no subject)
Date: 2010-05-04 04:52 pm (UTC)Are you still in DC? Will you be there over 4th of July weekend? Aaron & I are coming up for a post-wedding-thingy and would love to see you!
I am so amused by your list of her flaws - one reason I never read her books was because the descriptions by people who loved them made them sound more overblown than I was really interested in reading.
To quote a classic:
Date: 2010-05-04 04:57 pm (UTC)I am...
I am Superman, and I can do anything...
Yeah, maybe notsomuch of an understanding of the law, ya think?
(no subject)
Date: 2010-05-04 05:16 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2010-05-04 05:32 pm (UTC)I just don't know. I did enjoy reading them, especially the third book which I re-read whenever I need silly escapism. She'd probably object to my classification and point out that hers is not mere romance, it is a literary historical novel.
(no subject)
Date: 2010-05-04 05:33 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2010-05-04 06:09 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2010-05-04 06:46 pm (UTC)What really annoys me is that she seems to have dropped those sweeping generalizations and triggering words in there as a way to get people all riled up about the 'big bad fic writers' before coming out and saying that she was basically sending a C&D to someone who was just trying to do what they could for a friend in need. Yeah. I really sympathize with your situation lady.
(no subject)
Date: 2010-05-04 06:49 pm (UTC)