(no subject)
Mar. 13th, 2005 08:46 amHi to everyone from Fandom Wank, who clearly believe that I live online.
I'm going to say this one more time:
I didn't refuse to post a link. In fact, I suggested she post to the Fandom Help LJ (yes, i got the url wrong - that happens when I'm posting via a handheld, and not on the computer, as it's impossible to have two browser windows open at a time), and I said that I would also use her Amazon link. I meant that if she posted about it on
fandom_help, I'd link to that. What I did not feel that I had the time to do was this:
That, to me, sounded like she wanted me to organize something educational/fundraisery specifically about her cancer and other sufferers, and I think it's understandable to everyone that such a project would be time consuming. I can't do it, and if that makes me an evil and heartless bitch, then I encourage all of you to go out and do it in my stead. If you can't, if you don't have the time in your schedule right now, then you're all heartless bitches, too.
I don't have the talent to do what
cleolinda is doing with her parody project, or what crocheters or others are offering to do. I haven't even had the time to write a drabble in over six months, so I can't offer drabbles to donors.
And I don't live online (look! I even said I was going offline for a while yesterday morning!), so I certainly didn't know the F_W posting regarding
sapphsmum's misunderstanding of my Friday reply to her until I came on this morning to a hailstorm of PMs about it.
But if I misunderstood her, then she certainly had the opportunity to correct my misunderstanding either by replying to my reply on her LJ, or in replying to my reply on my own, if she's been online since then, which I wouldn't presume to suppose, as I wouldn't want someone to presume that regarding me.
In sum - a link is one thing - and this is the one that, to me, seems most comprehensive - but a full-on fundraising project is another.
I'm going to say this one more time:
I didn't refuse to post a link. In fact, I suggested she post to the Fandom Help LJ (yes, i got the url wrong - that happens when I'm posting via a handheld, and not on the computer, as it's impossible to have two browser windows open at a time), and I said that I would also use her Amazon link. I meant that if she posted about it on
give a shout out to your friends list and ask them to do the same to make them aware that other women are dying that have cancer but it isn't breast cancer? We need financial help and a chance too. This cancer or other cancers that aren't "popular" with celebrities etc.,could hit you or anyone you love and you too would then be in my shoes looking for any help you can get, because there isn't any help out here except for the help of strangers.
That, to me, sounded like she wanted me to organize something educational/fundraisery specifically about her cancer and other sufferers, and I think it's understandable to everyone that such a project would be time consuming. I can't do it, and if that makes me an evil and heartless bitch, then I encourage all of you to go out and do it in my stead. If you can't, if you don't have the time in your schedule right now, then you're all heartless bitches, too.
I don't have the talent to do what
And I don't live online (look! I even said I was going offline for a while yesterday morning!), so I certainly didn't know the F_W posting regarding
But if I misunderstood her, then she certainly had the opportunity to correct my misunderstanding either by replying to my reply on her LJ, or in replying to my reply on my own, if she's been online since then, which I wouldn't presume to suppose, as I wouldn't want someone to presume that regarding me.
In sum - a link is one thing - and this is the one that, to me, seems most comprehensive - but a full-on fundraising project is another.
(no subject)
Date: 2005-03-13 03:38 pm (UTC)losersover at FW have been busier wanking and sniping at a tempest in a teapot over a misunderstanding.(no subject)
Date: 2005-03-14 12:16 am (UTC)If he's lost his job, guess what? They suddenly qualify for all that assistance they couldn't get before!
Don't you stress about it for one second. *pets you*
(no subject)
Date: 2005-03-14 12:24 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2005-03-14 01:25 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2005-03-14 01:26 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2005-03-14 01:27 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2005-03-14 01:48 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2005-03-14 01:50 am (UTC)I'm just bemused at why people feel the need to wank at heidi8 over this. Doesn't help anyone in need one darned bit, now, does it?
(no subject)
Date: 2005-03-14 03:12 am (UTC)Desperation doesn't mean one is entitled to spam someone else's journal. It's tacky, simple enough. And it can turn off some people from donating in the first place.
(no subject)
Date: 2005-03-14 03:13 am (UTC)Heidi, my apologies for extending the wank but I had to reply.
(no subject)
Date: 2005-03-14 04:59 am (UTC)A few links, since I'm sure you haven't seen this yet:
http://www.livejournal.com/users/sapphsmum/14125.html?thread=123181#t123181
http://www.livejournal.com/users/sapphsmum/14125.html?thread=120621#t120621
While I appreciate their determination to defend their friend/person they admire, going on the attack in the dying woman's journal -- questioning if she is really sick -- is making them look like callous assholes. And, since they're speaking on your behalf, they're making you look like one too.
I don't imagine that you've asked them to do this. I know you can speak for yourself. But I'm hoping you can call the rabid fanpoodles off.
This whole thing - we can call it wank, defending your friends, charity, whatever. But the woman is in the hospital. She's dying of cancer. You don't have time to get involved in her cause, and believe me, I find that understandable. But what's going on in her journal, with people "defending" you? It's vile and disgusting. Enough is enough - please, when you get back online, put a stop to it.
(no subject)
Date: 2005-03-14 05:29 am (UTC)(frozen) (no subject)
Date: 2005-03-14 12:00 pm (UTC)I'm sorry but I could not just read this and not make a comment. A woman so desperate that she's willing to forget about her pride and just beg for her life is tacky? It turns people (and I presume by people you must mean you among them) off donating? Out of all this wank, so far, your "it's tacky" comment is striking me as one of the most cold-hearted comments of the lot. I don't know you at all, so really, I shouldn't be passing judgment on you. But with a comment as stupidly bitchy as that about someone who's--I repeat--begging for her life, don't be surprised if people (mis)label you for a cold-hearted stupid bint.
That said, what I'm now thinking of you never went through my mind about Heidi as I was reading this. Just know that with a comment like that one, you're working against Heidi's cause rather than for it. She misunderstood a plea for help from someone she had some history with, it happens and it doesn't make her a bitch or anything. Heidi explained what she'd misunderstood and did not call Christina by any names, nor label her plea for help as tacky.
You've done what any person left in a position to have to forget about their own pride so they can beg for their life fears: you've shown scorn and disgust towards Christina and her cause. And yes, that's exactly what you did by using the term tacky here. I certainly hope that you never find yourself in Christina's shoes lest you find yourself obliged to act in a tacky way.
(no subject)
Date: 2005-03-14 12:11 pm (UTC)So rude.
(no subject)
Date: 2005-03-14 12:12 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2005-03-14 12:28 pm (UTC)I find your comment extremely rude, a lot more so than
(no subject)
Date: 2005-03-14 01:53 pm (UTC)Yes, Mouse, how very rude of me to make a polite request and not attack Heidi in her own journal.
Heidi, I'm sorry if my comment has added to your stress and endangered your pregnancy, as the mouse seems to think it has. Please accept my apologies, and know this was not my intention.
(no subject)
Date: 2005-03-14 02:16 pm (UTC)(frozen) (no subject)
Date: 2005-03-14 02:17 pm (UTC)In terms of the people I do know,
Also, on a slightly tangentinal note, I was thinking that it's a little unfair and disengenuous for you to call either my RL friends, or people who haven't friended me in the first place fangirls or "rabid fanpoodles", but since I don't know whose posts have been screened, for the sake of this discussion I'll presume that among those are posts by people who have friended me but who I don't know IRL. It's safer that way.
(frozen) (no subject)
Date: 2005-03-14 02:42 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2005-03-14 02:56 pm (UTC)She can't defend herself, she's hospitalised, and I doubt that when she comes back, she wants to read how certain people believe she's a liar and making up the fact that she has cancer.
Is there some disappearing posts that I'm not reading? Where has ANYONE SAID THAT? Good lord, defending Heidi does not equal calling Christina a liar.
(frozen) (no subject)
Date: 2005-03-14 03:09 pm (UTC)-waits expectantly-
Of course, I can't be linked to it, because it doesn't exist, because you made it up. The fact is, NEITHER SIDE in this equation is behaving particularly well. Heidi's friends are overstating the rudeness of Christina's initial action, and the people attacking Heidi are behaving like psychotic stalker freaks.
You can't dump the responsibility for ending this wank on Heidi. She didn't start it - people like you did. Nor is in an especially intelligent move to try to get someone to do what you want them to do by calling their friends "loathsome excuses for human beings." And isn't there some fandom wank "rule" about not trolling people's LJ's? Good to see you guys really stick to that one.
(frozen) (no subject)
Date: 2005-03-14 03:19 pm (UTC)(frozen) (no subject)
Date: 2005-03-14 03:21 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2005-03-14 03:30 pm (UTC)And I'm sorry for what you see as my disingenuousness (disingenuity?) and unfairness by calling the people fangirls and "rabid fanpoodles". I was working under the assumption that they weren't all your friends, and were defending you out of some feeling of fannish loyalty, rather than a close relationship, and I think that "fangirl" fit the bill there. The "rabid fanpoodles" was meant to characterize their behavior more than anything.