Q: How old are Charlie and Bill Weasley in relation to their other siblings?
A: Oh dear, maths. Let me think. Bill is two years older than Charlie, who is two years older than Percy.
I think ALL of fandom, regardless of SHIP preference, regardless of who you're friends with and who you find annoying, regardless of when you entered fandom, whether you're on LJ or not, whether you write NC17 or G-rated stuff, is in FULL agreement when we say...
And I think we all agree that she should hire
sjbranford to walk two paces behind her at all times, and do her maths for her. Think of what she'd save in tips per year!
A: Oh dear, maths. Let me think. Bill is two years older than Charlie, who is two years older than Percy.
I think ALL of fandom, regardless of SHIP preference, regardless of who you're friends with and who you find annoying, regardless of when you entered fandom, whether you're on LJ or not, whether you write NC17 or G-rated stuff, is in FULL agreement when we say...
Wha?
And I think we all agree that she should hire
(no subject)
Date: 2004-03-04 08:40 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2004-03-04 08:40 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2004-03-04 08:42 am (UTC)Do you have the link for the puppet movies you have made icons of? I was trying to find it. Thanks
(no subject)
Date: 2004-03-04 08:42 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2004-03-04 08:44 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2004-03-04 08:47 am (UTC)Harry + Ron + Hermione + Parvati + Lavender + Neville + Seamus + Dean,
then add two, hitherto unmentioned, fifth year girls
and end up with a class of 30 Gryffindors in Umbridge's DADA class in OotP?
(no subject)
Date: 2004-03-04 08:49 am (UTC)(Would anyone like to hear the story of the LotR chapter re-written because of the phases of the moon?)
Ms. Rowling writes a good story, but she really needs to be more accurate in her details.
(no subject)
Date: 2004-03-04 08:51 am (UTC)(Obviously, I'm less meticulous than JKR, eh? ;->)
(no subject)
Date: 2004-03-04 08:51 am (UTC)... brain... hurts...
(no subject)
Date: 2004-03-04 08:52 am (UTC)That said, I'm agreed that
(no subject)
Date: 2004-03-04 08:54 am (UTC):snerk:
(no subject)
Date: 2004-03-04 08:58 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2004-03-04 09:02 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2004-03-04 09:02 am (UTC)Or JKR could have screwed up with the math again. Yes, probably more likely
(no subject)
Date: 2004-03-04 09:03 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2004-03-04 09:04 am (UTC)Then I too am awful. Ask me a math question and make me answer on the spot and I'll get it wrong every time. Yesterday I said I could get a project done in ten working days, and was asked "When will that be?" (meaning the date, not the day of the week). And I got it wroooooooong. Twice. Until I picked up the calendar and counted with my finger. *empathizes with Rowling*
(no subject)
Date: 2004-03-04 09:08 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2004-03-04 09:09 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2004-03-04 09:12 am (UTC)Even if she couldn't remember the exact number, there's no reason she shouldn't be able to say "I don't remember exactly, but there's a big gap between Charlie and Percy." This assumes, though, that she's figured all this out, which I suspect is not the case.
(no subject)
Date: 2004-03-04 09:13 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2004-03-04 09:25 am (UTC)Someone said in Heidi's first thread about this chat that Rowling doesn't seem to put so much thought into every tiny element of the story, whereas the fans are trying to suss out Mrs. Norris's past. That's a funnily apt distinction - I think we fans put a lot of thought into the bric-a-brac because we sit and stare at the walls, whereas Rowling is still building the rest of the house.
Which is not a judgement on whether or not that's a bad thing; it's just an attempt to explain why I'm on the other side of the issue, and don't get irritated about this sort of thing... :D
(no subject)
Date: 2004-03-04 09:33 am (UTC)ARRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRGH. Agreed. She needs a detail beta ASAP.
(no subject)
Date: 2004-03-04 09:36 am (UTC)Yeah, that was me. :)
As I said, I'm pretty sure she doesn't have an answer figured out here - I don't think she has really paid much attention to this. The problem, of course, is that she can't just SAY that, so she makes stuff up. Often that may be inspired, but this is an area in which making stuff up in not a strength. I don't see anything wrong with wishing she would either have notes on this stuff or not talk about it.
Does it distract from the enjoyment of the work to have this inconsistent? No, I don't think so. Does it make things more complicated from a fandom POV? Yeah, it does. Not only for me personally (b/c I like to write Weasley family dynamics, and now I don't know how seriously to take this very off-the-cuff answer - is this what she's intended all along, or was this just being sloppy?) but on a larger scale. What's AU now - the books or the chat? Who knows?
And I see all of the Weasleys, Malfoys, Hogwarts faculty & MWPP folks as significant enough characters to at least have their own consistent timelines. It really doesn't take that long to sketch them out, particularly if she's going to reference events in their lives. We expect fic authors to do it. I don't know why she hasn't done this, if she hasn't.
Not the end of the world. Still not cool.
(no subject)
Date: 2004-03-04 09:36 am (UTC)i am so bad at math sometimes i wonder if i should hire
(no subject)
Date: 2004-03-04 09:40 am (UTC)But poor Ron! "Ron Bilius Weasley." Good god. Have mercy, Molly and Arthur (and JKR). Argh. I truly hope this isn't Bill's full first name. Ron's middle name sounds like a word that means "Resembling bile, especially in color: a bilious green." and "Having a peevish disposition; ill-humored." Was she worried we'd see the slug-vomiting incident a mile away if we knew about this?