snerk. Well, I've been talking about it on mine in rather broad terms, but it's screened, as I had a few personally-relevant reasons for commenting about the whole Disney issue (draw your own conclusions :) .
But anyway.
Yes, I'd vastly prefer the WB to Comcast -- for the simple reason that it's a company that actually produces and understands creative content, as opposed to Comcast, who spent the entire conference call I listened to talking about financial opportunities.
Besides, I'm sick of getting screwed out of increasing amounts of money by these people for crappy service. ;)
But I agree about the WB characters staying distinct from the Disney stable. It would get very odd otherwise....
![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
branchandroot
Re:
Date: 2004-02-14 09:56 am (UTC)But anyway.
Yes, I'd vastly prefer the WB to Comcast -- for the simple reason that it's a company that actually produces and understands creative content, as opposed to Comcast, who spent the entire conference call I listened to talking about financial opportunities.
Besides, I'm sick of getting screwed out of increasing amounts of money by these people for crappy service. ;)
But I agree about the WB characters staying distinct from the Disney stable. It would get very odd otherwise....
Looking forward to your Eisner-kerfuffle post.