Entry tags:
Ah, the 80s. How memorable they are!
![[livejournal.com profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/external/lj-userinfo.gif)
and caused me to create the following poll:
[Poll #1101876]
Oh, and speaking of the 80s, Slate Magazine asks the question, "Should children read Philip Pullman's trilogy—or the incest classic Flowers in the Attic?"
I guess people can't read both? There's a limited number of words one's brain can read in a month or a year or a decade? Huh.
The article is definitely not perfect, and there's some apples-and-avocados comparisons, but I found this paragraph of particular interest given recent actions by 6A:
At the same time, when I think back to my own preteen reading, I'll admit that the whole point was to read books that I wasn't ready for, without my parents' approval. Is this kind of illicit read damaging to kids, or is it an inevitable excursion into pseudo-maturity that beats a lot of the other likely avenues? Better a disturbing, too-adult book than an indelibly horrifying movie or Internet game or video (or, it goes without saying, an encounter with real scary people)?
no subject
You are evil for making us choose only ONE scariest thing in that video. Sheesh. I really hope we can skip most of that crap when 80's fashions come back around. (which they are....my daughter has jordache jeans and "dresses" made to be worn with pants...)