Entry tags:
Ah, the 80s. How memorable they are!
![[livejournal.com profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/external/lj-userinfo.gif)
and caused me to create the following poll:
[Poll #1101876]
Oh, and speaking of the 80s, Slate Magazine asks the question, "Should children read Philip Pullman's trilogy—or the incest classic Flowers in the Attic?"
I guess people can't read both? There's a limited number of words one's brain can read in a month or a year or a decade? Huh.
The article is definitely not perfect, and there's some apples-and-avocados comparisons, but I found this paragraph of particular interest given recent actions by 6A:
At the same time, when I think back to my own preteen reading, I'll admit that the whole point was to read books that I wasn't ready for, without my parents' approval. Is this kind of illicit read damaging to kids, or is it an inevitable excursion into pseudo-maturity that beats a lot of the other likely avenues? Better a disturbing, too-adult book than an indelibly horrifying movie or Internet game or video (or, it goes without saying, an encounter with real scary people)?
no subject
no subject
The stuff with 6A was pretty bizarre- the deletion of pretty harmless comms and journals I thought was MAJOR overkill. It would have been better to give everyone a chance to change course before pulling the rug out from trusted longtime members.
But as to 'allowing' kids to get into stuff... there's a big difference between what people encourage their children to do, and the limits they would ultimately set if they could reasonably expect fulfillment of all possible negative consequences.
My parents were very conservative and 'overprotective' of some things which to them in hindsight seem a little silly, but which at the time bore the keynote appearances of threatening influences- things with occult references (Buffy), things with secular or 'moral relativist' themes (Boy Meets World)... my parents raised me a certain way, because they wanted me to become a decent, Christian human being.
Instead what they got was a decent, liberal atheist. But they're happy with the result. Granted, I never suffered any intentional detriment at their or anyone else's hands; but I'm not sure that being super-restrictive is any better than setting no boundaries at all.
no subject
I actually never read it - I shied away from 99% of all horror (other than Scream) until Supernatural so FitA freaked me out because it was a "horror story", or so I was told, not because of the sexual content. But I read Forever and Wifey when I was 11, at camp, so...
no subject
I never read either. Maybe I should? I was more a child of the '90s, so they were probably a little before my time, even though I devoured books as a kid. I did attend Xian school until I was almost 10. :P
no subject
Here is one of my fave songs and videos (We didn't get MTV till 1986 so I would watch my videos on Friday Night Videos on NBC..lol. I was always praying for a Duran Duran video.)
Oh shoot here is a Duran Duran video too:
As for books. I pretty much read anything and everything I could get my hands on, the only thing my mom censored was Stephen King till I was 16. I think if you have a firm foundation in life then reading everything you can get your mitts on can be ok...because in the end you realize it is only fiction after all. (I love the His Dark Materials trilogy and still am a firm Orthodox Christian. lol.)
no subject
And I agree with you about reading fiction. Haven't there been studies that show that reading about something manifests differently in the brain than watching a still picture or motion picture about it?
no subject
I thought I had it bad until my reborn Christian aunt visited, and I realized that she was even more strict than Mom! My cousins were not allowed to watch most of the movies I loved, and I remember her blowing a gasket and praying for my soul when I bought a pair of earrings at the Salem Witch Museum. I would have been angry or thought she was trying to be difficult if she had not been extremely serious and panicked.
no subject
Same with my half sister who has friends whose parents won't let them read Harry Potter and of course our dad bought her all the books and she loans them out to the friends who aren't allowed to read them.
You just have to let kids explore and read, no harm, no foul imo. Also I let my girls get their ears pierced last year when they were 5 and 3. They really wanted it. I figured why not? and they look adorable in their little gold hoops.
:)
no subject
no subject
FitA scared me a lot more than Cujo or any horror novel. I do remember that I thought the title sounded interesting, and I was expecting something a bit more like The Diary of Anne Frank. I read quite of few of Andrews books, and they all seemed to be full of nonconsensual incest. I don't remember how old I was, since I had read a lot of young adult novels when I was in third grade. (I had exhausted the children's library in my town.)
I've never read His Dark Materials, or The Dark Is Rising series. The best thing about Harry Potter is that it was one of the first books to appeal to a broad age range. Before Goblet of Fire came out, I had not heard of the series. Can you believe that? And now, Rowling's books are my main obsession. ^_^
no subject
First time someone tells me not to read something, I wonder what they want to hide. Even if a book is talking about or espousing ideas that are not in line with your own, it should still be YOUR choice to read or not. And even then I look sideways at people who say they avoid certain books -- its like closing a window on a view you may never see again.
Sorry, went off on a little rant there. I just really really really dislike people who want to control books and ideas.
How bout Duran Duran? Tho I remember being titillated by the video "Wild Boys" with Simon LeBon all wet and tied to the water wheel thing. I should go looking for that.
no subject
You are evil for making us choose only ONE scariest thing in that video. Sheesh. I really hope we can skip most of that crap when 80's fashions come back around. (which they are....my daughter has jordache jeans and "dresses" made to be worn with pants...)
no subject
I loved FitA when I was 11 or so, and bought and read several V. C. Andrews books. A few years later age and bit of wisdom caught up with me as I realised that the Andrews books were truly, madly, deeply awful. :D The content never bothered me; it was just the writing and storylines in general that got on my nerves. I actually find Pullman's work more believable. I disposed of the Andrews books years ago but my copy of Northern Lights is on my bookshelf, waiting for 10-year-old Beth to finish reading the other 6 books she has on the go. I'm against book censorship and Beth knows that she's allowed to read or flip through any of my books.
(OK, OK, The Joy is Sex is tucked in the back of the bookcase for now, but you know what I mean! Anyway Beth's still at the age where she thinks people kissing is "yucky".)
no subject
Something of a similar note was on EW nearly a yaer ago -
CONFESSIONS OF AN EW PARENT - Livre Free Or Die - EW's books editor Tina Jordan asks: What do you do when you hate what your daughter is reading?
She then had a follow up article here - CONFESSIONS OF AN EW PARENT - Scarlet Letters V.C. Andrews' ''Flowers in the Attic'' series? Judy Blume's ''Forever''? Stephen King's ''Christine''? If you hid your reading list from your parents, you're not alone
no subject
I remember Danielle Steel being off limits until about 12 or 13, and the same for Stephen King. The one book I have strong memories about reading despite being told not to was "Go Ask Alice" ... I would read it in the back corner of the library at my middle school because I couldn't check it out and take it home, and the librarian was a friend of my dad's so I didn't want her to see me reading it either. Ultimately, I don't feel damaged for having limits, and once I reached my teenage years, I was allowed to read whatever I wanted.
I guess the big thing for me is, if your kids want to read /watch /play something that has moral themes you find questionable or disagree with, the key may not be preventing them from reading it, but reading it with them, or at least having frequent conversations about it.
no subject
I don't believe they ever made a video for Bitchin' Camaro, so I'll add some ABC.
And this one that made making an "S" with your arms a classic dance move.
But if you really want the bad videos, you'd have to go back to the earliest in the late 70s, like this one.
Okay. Sorry I went a little nuts with the videos. I'm done!